I-5: Semen Analysis - Clinical Laboratories; Is Standardization Applied?
نویسنده
چکیده مقاله:
Reduced semen quality is commonly claimed to be one of the main signs of male infertility and thus, analysis of semen is recommended as the cornerstone of a male fertility investigation. However, to control possible sources of physiological and methodological variation, and to generate reliable information on semen quality that can be accurately compared across different laboratories, semen analysis should be performed according to generally accepted, international recommendations and standardized procedures. Quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) are essential aspects of any laboratory testing process. Both ensure that the data generated by the laboratory are consistent from one day to the next and that the results from one laboratory can be compared with those generated by others. However, whereas QA and QC approaches in many areas of laboratory medicine (e.g., clinical biochemistry and haematology) were relatively well developed in the 1970s and 1980s, their application to the andrology laboratories has been a relatively recent development. Andrology laboratories need to produce reliable results for appropriate diagnostic and health care decisions. Since semen analysis is highly complex and procedurally difficult to standardize, QC is essential to detect and correct systematic errors and high variability of results. The large discrepancies between assessments of sperm concentration and morphology in different laboratories underline the need for improved QC and standardization, with the goal of improving the quality and standardization of semen analysis and enhancing the comparability of results from different laboratories. Until there are universally accepted standard methods and definitions of motility and morphology, it will not be possible to compare results from different laboratories. Whatever its size, each laboratory should implement a QA programme, based on standardized methods and procedures, to ensure that results are both accurate and precise. In some countries, QA programmes are required by law, in others, by accreditation bodies or health insurance systems. The World Health Organization (WHO) laboratory manual is recognized worldwide as the gold standard for human semen examination. It provides clear guidelines for this analysis and for the reduction of laboratory errors. The manual was first published in 1980. Since then, it has been regularly revised and updated, and the most recent fifth edition appeared in 2010. Although the WHO manuals have been available for more than 30 years, there are still reports revealing a lack of standardization of the methods used in andrology laboratories and wide variation in the results obtained among laboratory technicians in many countries. The principle of good practice in laboratories is the implementation of standardized, validated methods and equipment for the evaluation of the defined parameters. In consequence, it assures a proper basis for achieving an accurate, reliable and controlled service in the laboratory and its accreditation. For more than 30 years, the WHO has attempted to improve the quality of semen analysis by publishing manuals providing a detailed description of standardized methods and procedures for the evaluation of semen analysis. Unfortunately, adherence to these guidelines is sometimes selective and laboratories adopt not all the recommended methods for their seminological service, which may result in difficulties in interpreting and comparing the results of semen analysis.
منابع مشابه
Semen analysis standardization: is there any problem in Polish laboratories?
The aim of the study was to determine the degree of compliance of Polish laboratories with World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations, with regard to semen analysis methodology. A survey requesting information about methods of semen analysis was distributed to employees of 55 laboratories. Respondents who had participated in external seminological workshops (31%) were termed certified resp...
متن کاملEvaluation of the Standardization in Semen Analysis Performance According to the WHO Protocols Among Laboratories in Tehran, Iran
Background and Objective: Infertility refers to the failure in achieving pregnancy of a couple after one year of regular sexual intercourse without using a protection method. The purpose of this research work was to evaluate the current status of the test and quality control performance in semen analysis in selected laboratories. Material and Methods: The...
متن کاملEvaluation of biochemical methods performance in clinical laboratories: is this performance suitable for clinical application?
Background: Clinical application of the test results are profoundly influenced by laboratory errors. Nowadays, the best way to evaluate the performance of a method is to determine its sigma scale according to total allowable error (TEa) and analytical errors, including random and systematic errors. In this study, the performance of the measuring kits for biochemical analytes belonging to Pars A...
متن کاملWhat Is Applied Literature?
Applied literature is a term that is the outcome of a need to put literature to tangible uses in the “real” world. A medical practitioner looking for a definition of life, for instance, finds literature a useful source for the answer. With paradigm shifts in scientific studies, interdisciplinarity has been a method to overcome the alienations that resulted from the isolation of disciplines from...
متن کاملRSA Laboratories Bulletin #5
Introduction During 1996, a new attack on cryptographic devices was proposed by researchers at Bellcore. This attack depends on introducing errors into key-dependent cryptographic operations through physical intrusion. Soon after, the initial Bellcore work which focused on public-key techniques was extended and applied to secret-key encryption techniques. It also motivated a series of discussio...
متن کاملRSA Laboratories Bulletin #5
This bulletin describes a recently devised attack on PKCS #1 v1.5, the RSA Encryption Standard [3]. This attack affects only the digital envelope portion of PKCS #1. In the following sections we describe the digital enveloping method in PKCS #1 and the new attack. We also describe a variety of countermeasures that successfully thwart the attack, in particular, we describe the countermeasure to ...
متن کاملمنابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ذخیره در منابع من قبلا به منابع من ذحیره شده{@ msg_add @}
عنوان ژورنال
دوره 7 شماره 3
صفحات 3- 3
تاریخ انتشار 2013-09-01
با دنبال کردن یک ژورنال هنگامی که شماره جدید این ژورنال منتشر می شود به شما از طریق ایمیل اطلاع داده می شود.
میزبانی شده توسط پلتفرم ابری doprax.com
copyright © 2015-2023